Modern history is subjective, to some degree written to reflect the motives or agendas of the writers. The winners of wars write history from their perspective. So in some degrees ... It's Questionable.
Ancient history is like a puzzle. Facts are facts. Interpretations could be subjective. In terms of factual evidence, the unexplained which follows a logical progression to a conclusion, but is contrary to scientific thought... well, its always explained away or left simply unexplained. Or scientifically explained that what was done was done in the most unimagable hardest way possible, if not completely impossible. So theories abound. To the open mind, theories certainly seem more logical than the denial of scientific uncertainty.
One of those mysteries in history is Antarctica. For thousands of years its been completely covered with ice and snow. Ice covering the waterways and the ocean surrounding it. Yet a map dating to the 1500s, a reproduction of an earlier map, shows the coastline and interior land features that should not have been known. A coastline that only with modern technical equipment today was able to determine the coastline burried under hundreds of feet of ice and snow. So how is the map scientifically explained? It can't be.
So there you have it... History... Unexplained.
Just something to think about...
